Nikon Coolpix P50

• Average user rating: 3.0 stars out of 5 reviews
• My rating: 0 stars

• Sort by: Most helpful Highest rating Lowest rating Most recent

• 3 stars

  first test not so good

  by joe510 on October 19, 2007

  Pros: wide angle lens

  Cons: soft and washed out colors at tele

  Summary: not good , first shots on full auto gave tele shots with soft focus and washed out colors. wide angle shots were better. I think the shutter speeds were too slow ...

  Read more

  Summary: not good , first shots on full auto gave tele shots with soft focus and washed out colors. wide angle shots were better. I think the shutter speeds were too slow for sharpness. the electronic VR is a joke, it appears to do nothing. What is wrong with Nikon ? their point and shoot are so bad! This was my second try, the first was a L6, that thing is super slow to focus or do anything else. At least the p50 is a little faster, thats about the best I can say for it. Save your money, look somewhere else.

  Show less

  4 out of 4 users found this user opinion helpful.

• 8 stars

  Excellent all rounder

  by gorpalm on November 25, 2007

  Pros: Wide-angle, lots of functionality and manual control, good value

  Cons: Slow focus, slow cont.shot, noisier than I like in low-light

  Summary: Have had the P50 for a couple of weeks now, and taken a couple hundred shots in a variety of conditions. These comments are updated from my original posting on ...

  Read more

  Summary: Have had the P50 for a couple of weeks now, and taken a couple hundred shots in a variety of conditions. These comments are updated from my original posting on amazon.co.uk:
  
  1) The photos.
  The camera uses the smallest chip around 1:1/2.5 - don't know what that means, just that it's Very small. With 8m pixels crammed on this sensor, low light non-flash shots are quite noisy. My other cam is a fuji F31 though, which is just about the best p&s for low light, so maybe I've been spoilt. Flash shots are near enough perfect (and flash intensity can be fine tuned too), distance and close up outdoor shots also give good detail. Handles highlights quite well and brings out detail in shadows. Managed to keep the balance in bright outdoor shots without blowing out the blue sky or plunging the shaded foreground into gloom. All photos do benefit with a bit of sharpening in photoshop (app the P5100 also has shots that are a bit soft out of camera, so it looks like its a Nikon thing), but still perfectly usable straight out the unit. I've now also just upped the in-camera sharpening level to see if it might make a difference. Exposure hard to fool, but white balance you need to keep an eye on (especially in custom, which if combined with flash gets you a blue hued photo).
  
  2) The design.
  Easy to hold, looks good finished in all-black. Slightly slimmer and feels better put together than the Canon A570IS (4x zoom but no wide-angle). Uses AA batteries - sucks them dry quite quickly so recommend getting decent rechargeables as soon as you can. Looks a bit like it's elder siblings P5000/P5100 from the front, round the screen back it has a more conventional layout - most functions easily accessed through a combination of the rotating dial at the top of the camera (different modes) and the menu key on the back, which depending on the mode you're using gives you access to a wide range of set-up options.
  
  Menu system not totally intuitive, but makes a good stab at it. One thing about the body, if you hold the camera with both hands whilst using the flash, need to be careful not to let a finger stand proud even slightly over the top of the body above the flash - it'll result in a shaded area at the top of your photo. Never had this before on any other camera, but it's just a design thing you have to adapt to.
  
  Viewfinder for emergency use only.
  
  3) Functionality.
  Full manual on cd-rom - I still do hanker after the A5 or A6 sized manuals of old. Bought this camera because of it's combination of wide-angle lens, some manual flexibility, things like face detection and (electronic) image stabilisation all at c.GBP150 or so (looks like US consumers have it even better). Had tried and returned a Olympus FE-290 the week before because it was the same price, with wide-angle, but didn't have any of the additional functions mentioned above.
  
  The electronic image stabilisation (e-VR) works ok with NO shaky shots so far but it hasn't been tried in extremis, and the screen tells you when it's been employed in a shot. You need to get to the P5000 level before they bring in the superior, optical/mechanical image stabilisation - which is a bit cheap of Nikon, since Canon uses a mechanical system on their cameras in this price range.
  
  In manual mode you can adjust shutter speed (8secs to 1/1000) and aperture (only two options -F2.8 OR F5.6). Image size can be adjusted too (in all modes), including 16:9 mode that's a decent 3200x1800 resolution. For some modes you can select image colour (softer, vivid etc) which I've kept mostly on vivid, for more dramatic photos. White balance includes manual adjustment which I find most useful for lower light flash free shots - noisy but usable, and keeps the yellow cast away. WB also has flash option, which works at keeping colours non-washed out in a flash photo.
  
  Metering has four options including Spot AF, and continuous shot has five options - in the latter case continuous, Nikon's Best Shot Selector, multi-shot are unavailable if Noise Reduction is switched on. Noise reduction helps mop up noise in low shutter speed shots, but sacrifices detail - still fine for 5x7 prints though, or (taking it on a photo by photo basis) even larger. Auto focus has 4 options including face priority and manual, the latter which allows you to frame the shot whilst moving the focal point onto the primary focal spot. Flash exposure can also be adjusted.
  
  And finally.
  Overall a wide range of manual functions and Nikon functionality (BSS, D-Lighting etc) that encourages you to explore the commendable limits of this camera. Wide angle coupled with functions coupled with price make this a winner. Slow focusing and post-shot processing (even w an SDHC card) limits your moving-subject type shots. No battery indicator until you're just about out of juice - frankly you need more warning.
  I think this cam deserves to be shortlisted on anybody's list who wants a wide-angle, some manual control, some 'gee-whiz' functions, whilst keeping an eye on the $$.

  Show less

  3 out of 3 users found this user opinion helpful.

• 3 stars

  blurry images

  by Dave543 on November 24, 2007

  Pros: adequate features, seems well-built

  Cons: poor quality images

  Summary: Soft focus would be a very generous term for the images I've gotten from this camera. Blurry would be more accurate. Especially on the left side of the image, ...

  Read more

  Summary: Soft focus would be a very generous term for the images I've gotten from this camera. Blurry would be more accurate. Especially on the left side of the image, some areas look like I might have smeared sunscreen on the lens but it's brand new and spotless. Lousy optics is all I can guess is the problem.
  
  Contrast is too high, even when on the reduced setting. Light areas are washed out while dark areas are black and underexposed.
  
  I've had several small digital cameras over the years and this is the most disappointing. There's no point in capturing 8-megapixels with the Coolpix P50. I got much sharper images with the 5-megapixel camera I used for three years. This one is bound for Ebay after just a month of ownership.
  
  I shoot mainly landscapes, where lack of detail and sharpness is noticeable. This camera might be fine for everyday close-up shots of people, street scenes, etc.

  Show less

  2 out of 3 users found this user opinion helpful.

• 8 stars

  Very nice pictures when you know how to use the camera

  by Skorpii on June 8, 2008

  Pros: Nice features/manual controls

  Cons: Slow response and some noise at hi ISO

  Summary: I paid 160$ for this camera and would recommend it to anyone that wants a simple point and shoot camera and would suit a amateur that likes lots of features ...

  Read more

  Summary: I paid 160$ for this camera and would recommend it to anyone that wants a simple point and shoot camera and would suit a amateur that likes lots of features and manual controles. I used the camera with a tripod and ALL the pics came out very nice and sharp.

  Show less

• 8 stars

  A truly great camera

  by iv.13 on February 28, 2008

  Pros: Good value for money

  Cons: It s a bit wide

  Summary: Nikon P50 is a great camera, good value for money and it also has the wide angle option which cameras it s price don t have.

  Summary: Nikon P50 is a great camera, good value for money and it also has the wide angle option which cameras it s price don t have.

See pricing