Sony DualShock 3 Wireless Controller (Black)

• Average user rating: 4.0 stars out of 12 reviews
• My rating: 0 stars

• 1
• 2
• next

• Sort by: Most helpful Highest rating Lowest rating Most recent

• 8 stars

  More of a response to the review rather than a review itself.

  by roninhyde on April 4, 2008

  Pros: Slightly more heft, battery life still great

  Cons: 5 more dollars, L2/R2 buttons carry over their weirdness from the SIXAXIS

  Summary: I've had one of these controllers since November 2007 (Japanese model can be purchased for equal or less on ebaY).
  
  I just wanted to correct David Carnoy (again) about
  
  ...

  Read more

  Summary: I've had one of these controllers since November 2007 (Japanese model can be purchased for equal or less on ebaY).
  
  I just wanted to correct David Carnoy (again) about the non-user-replaceable battery. You CAN change it. The Dual Shock 3 has screws on the back unlike an iPod. Also there are how-to directions in the manual a few pages from the how-to on replacing the HDD. Granted, I'm not exactly sure what kind of battery goes into the Dual Shock, but the fact remains you can still change it.

  Show less

  2 out of 2 users found this user opinion helpful.

• 8 stars

  So far so good.

  by seantagorek on April 6, 2008

  Pros: Good feel to it and adds to gameplay, especially Warhawk

  Cons: A little pricey

  Summary: Gamestop had this a bit earlier than some other stores, just picked it up today and I really like it. After trying it with a few games I find it ...

  Read more

  Summary: Gamestop had this a bit earlier than some other stores, just picked it up today and I really like it. After trying it with a few games I find it really adds to the gameplay. Mainly I tested it on Warhawk and Resistance Fall of Man. The only thing I wonder is how varied, nuanced and strong the vibration is compared to some games I've played in the past on say an Xbox 360, maybe its the same but I don't have a system to test it side by side, but maybe I need something with more of a plot to it that uses the feedback to add to the movie like feel (like a Dead Rising type of game). But its got a good weight to it, and though a little pricey if you need an extra controller anyway this is a good buy all in all. Happy I got it.

  Show less

  1 out of 1 users found this user opinion helpful.

• 10 stars

  Best controller for the ps3.

  by pcporter827 on February 18, 2012

  Pros: great battery life, comfortable in hands, super responsive

  Cons: fragile dont drop or throw, sixaxis is almost useless, doesnt come with usb charging cable

  Summary: i really love the controller layout for the ps3, its comfortable and familiar. i think its the best controller for the ps3 (being the only official one) and its perfect ...

  Read more

  Summary: i really love the controller layout for the ps3, its comfortable and familiar. i think its the best controller for the ps3 (being the only official one) and its perfect for playing first person shooters.

  Show less

• 8 stars

  Gamebacker.com,have the same good sony dualshock 3 !

  by zhongnan on September 28, 2011

  Pros: low price,fast shipping

  Cons: doesn't come with a USB cable for recharging

  Summary: i love sony dualshock 3,really great for my PS3!

  Summary: i love sony dualshock 3,really great for my PS3!

• 10 stars

  Reliable,Good battery life, bluetooth works well

  by moneyrules on September 5, 2010

  Pros: -Good battery life
  -Always Responsive and USB charging is easy and simple
  -Durable had it fall of of many surfaces you can t see any damage at all

  Cons: -none eveything seems perfect

  Summary: This is a good controller that is great for your PS3

  Summary: This is a good controller that is great for your PS3

• 6 stars

  I can't believe nobody's mentioned this

  by Operator7 on September 28, 2009

  Pros: Good battery life. Good button layout.

  Cons: The springs in the sticks cause lack of precision.

  Summary: The problem with the Sony controllers is the springs in the sticks.
  
  I have TWO original Sony Playstation controllers, and what they do (my friends have the same issues with ...

  Read more

  Summary: The problem with the Sony controllers is the springs in the sticks.
  
  I have TWO original Sony Playstation controllers, and what they do (my friends have the same issues with THEIR controllers as well) is make your character move when you don?t want.
  
  This prevents you from stopping where you want, shooting where you want, etc?????. because they stick is stuck to the right or left, because of the springs inside.
  
  I?ve tried using an oil lubricant, and everything else I can think of, to try to fix the issue.
  
  I think many people are just ?playing through? the problem, but if you realize it, it?s quite a big issue.
  
  I think the reason it?s not mentioned more, is because people just haven?t realized, why their character isn?t as precise as the way you are trying to move them.

  Show less

• 9 stars

  Better then just the regular Sixaxis

  by GojuBill on July 12, 2009

  Pros: it rumbles, thats the whole point. lets you know when you get shot or are shooting.

  Cons: THE PRICE!! no usb cord, THE PRICE!!

  Summary: its great, all i can really say is it's better then the regular Sixaxis that comes with the ps3, but the f'ing price, gimme a break.

  Summary: its great, all i can really say is it's better then the regular Sixaxis that comes with the ps3, but the f'ing price, gimme a break.

• 9 stars

  Best controller i have ever used.

  by aznboy318 on June 2, 2008

  Pros: Heavier than the too light Sixaxis, and more comfortable than too heavy 360 controller.

  Cons: little expensive

• 10 stars

  Awesome Controller Experience

  by wmdwhitt on April 21, 2008

  Pros: Better Feel. Directional Vibration.

  Cons: Absolutely None.

  Summary: This was worth the wait. It feels more realistic than ever before. The directional vibration doesn't allow you to get hit on the battlefield and then directly hit your ...

  Read more

  Summary: This was worth the wait. It feels more realistic than ever before. The directional vibration doesn't allow you to get hit on the battlefield and then directly hit your opponents. You have to re-aim and such. It is a shame that Microsoft help to patent block Sony from getting this out sooner. Microsoft really needs to focus its efforts on the Red Ring of Death (RRoD) not what Sony is doing.

  Show less

• 10 stars

  This was an inadaquate, inaccurate, insulting review.

  by FutureCTO on April 14, 2008

  Pros: Improved Rumble, Weight, 2 Year Battery Life, No battery memory from being charged too often or run down too low, Fastest controller sync, 30 hours gaming per charge

  Cons: Minor: Lacks a USB Type-A to Type-B cable for charging

  Summary: This Cnet review was AWEFUL! The reviewer call Sony "Being Cheap" and was insulting in tone. Lacked any knowledge that might come from reading the owners manual about changing the ...

  Read more

  Summary: This Cnet review was AWEFUL! The reviewer call Sony "Being Cheap" and was insulting in tone. Lacked any knowledge that might come from reading the owners manual about changing the battery. Horribly done.
  
  Just wanted to clarify something. Sony did not make the decision to drop dual shock on the PS3. Immersion sued Microsoft and Sony. Microsoft settled. In the settlement they agreed loan Immersion money, buy a lump 10% share, and continue to buy stock to keep them in business until the lawsuit against Sony was settled. Immersion was granted a court ordered injunction against Sony. This made using Dual Shock on the PS3 illegal. Sony then politely said it was last generation, rather than point out they were being handicapped by Immersion. Immersion had been losing moeny long before suing Sony. And hasn't had a single profitable year in 10 years. They sued in order to keep their head above water, Sony was using Dual shock before they were granted their Haptic Patent. Immersion is a poorly managed, brash, dishonest company. Microsoft had to sue them in order to collect money they had loaned Immersion to help them fight Sony.
  
  In regards to the PS3 Controller. It has a lithium Ion Battery, which means longer charges without recharge "memory" ruining the battery. Xbox 360 has a NiMH, which suffers from reduced capacity and recharge “memory� resulting in a shorter lifecycle. Microsoft needs the battery to be external because of its shorter life. The PS3's Li-Ion Battery has about a 2-3 year life. And despite forum prattlers it is not like the iPod. The PS3 owner’s manual points out the five screws on the under-side that need to unscrew. The just unplug change and plug in, perhaps once every two years. On the Xbox 360 wireless controller costs around $50 but does not come with a rechargeable battery or recharge cable. That kit costs an additional $20. So a wireless rechargeable Xbox 360 controller retails for $70, $15 more than the $55 PS3. Which has a superior battery, life, and charge duration.
  
  The news story that got people excited about the PS3 having the shortest battery life was authored by an ignorant idiot. Single use alkaline batteries always last longer than rechargeable batteries. They never bothered to compare the charge life of rechargeable batteries in the controllers. Anyone long time read of Consumer Reports would know how batteries really compare. Rechargeable have short lives on each charge but recharge 10's to 100's of times.

  Show less

• 1
• 2
• next

See pricing