Sennheiser CX 300 headphones (black)

• Average user rating: 3.5 stars out of 103 reviews
• My rating: 0 stars

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• ...
• 11
• next

• Sort by: Most helpful Highest rating Lowest rating Most recent

• 8 stars

  COMPARISON: Sennheiser CX-300 vs. Shure E2c

  by HeyItsJoel on October 7, 2006

  Pros: read review

  Cons: read review

  Summary: I'm the most picky consumer I know. I don't buy anything without reasearching it first and doing a personal comparison side-by-side second. Rarely do I buy anything without ...

  Read more

  Summary: I'm the most picky consumer I know. I don't buy anything without reasearching it first and doing a personal comparison side-by-side second. Rarely do I buy anything without doing my homework. I'm using the ARCHOS AV500 as my mp3 playback device. So, here we go...
  
  1. SOUND- Advantage: Sennheiser. I gave the slight nod to the CX300 because it delivered a more prominent BASS than E2c. The E2c had a difficult time handling the lower end and I had to max out everything on my equalizer to be able to get some bass. On the CX300's however, the bass hit me right from the get-go. I had to literally turn down the bass to a more manageable level. Otherwise, it will be thumping in your head. The way I see it, too much bass is better than not enough at all. In all fairness though, the E2c's handled the high's better. It's clearer and more crisp. If you listen to ROCK, POP or ACOUSTICS, go with the E2c. For R&B, HIP-HOP and JAZZ, the CX300 is the way to go.
  
  2. COMFORT- Advantage: Shure. The E2c's came with an array of tips including both rubber and foam. The CX300 came with only rubber but they are noticeably softer ones so it will contour to your ear's shape better than E2c rubbers. The most comfortable out of the two were E2c's foam tips though which CX300 doesn't provide. All tips came with SM, M, and L sizes.
  
  3. FIT- Advantage: Shure. Given the right size tips you choose, the E2c's fit your ear perfectly. These things will not fall out. Believe me I tried jumping up and down and shaking my head vigorously. They're in there good. The CX300 doesn't have the around-the-ear design that give the E2c's such a good fit so adjustments need to be done from time to time. For working out, E2c's will do nicely.
  
  4. CORDS- Advantage: Shure. The CX300 has irregular length being that the right side is longer than the left. This is so that you wrap the right earbud behind your neck and you have no choice but to put the mp3 player on your left side pocket. The E2c's not only have equal lengths (which I prefer) but have the luxury of durability with its thicker cords. It'll take significant abuse for these to be damaged. As far as length, both are generous. I stand at 5'10" and I can put my mp3 player in my pants pocket without the danger of the buds being pulled out during activity.
  
  5. NOISE REDUCTION- Advantage: Equal. If you have a good seal around you ear canal, ambient sounds coming from the outside world are drastically reduced. I played loud music with my stereo system and stood next to the garage door while opening/closing it and I couldn't hear a thing. It will give you complete sound isolation (when the music is playing. Without music you will be able to hear your fingers snapping). Please note: Do NOT use these in places where you need to hear important noises. In other words, if you're using these at the airport and you miss the announcement about your flight boarding early, don't blame me. Or when you're driving in your car with these on (dumb) and you run smack into an ambulance with its sirens in full blast, you're going to find yourself riding in the back seat of police car instead. Don't blame me.
  
  6. PRICE- Advantage: CX300. As of this writing (10/07/06), Amazon.com has the cheapest prices on the net. Shure E2c = $72+$5shipping. Sennheiser CX300 = $47+free shipping. Needless to say, you don't have to be a genius to figure this one out. Either that or go to your local retailer and pay MSRP. E2c's go for $99 and CX300's for $79.
  
  So, pick your poison. Both have their positives and negatives and which one you pick depends on which are more important to have. To me, the BASS sound and price of the Sennheiser CX-300 made it a no-brainer for me. Good luck.

  Show less

  19 out of 19 users found this user opinion helpful.

• 9 stars

  Awesome Sound! Definite Buy!

  by crazywidget on March 16, 2006

  Pros: Rich, Yummy Sound! Sound Isolation is great...

  Cons: cost, lacks carry pouch

  Summary: I just got these yesterday, and I have to say the sound is absolutely terrific, not to mention the added benefit from the sound isolation! I can finally hear all ...

  Read more

  Summary: I just got these yesterday, and I have to say the sound is absolutely terrific, not to mention the added benefit from the sound isolation! I can finally hear all those minute details. Seriously, you don't know what you're missing until you hear these puppies.
  
  My only wishes were for a carry pouch (given the cost) and the cost itself. I would also mention that since these do such a good job of isolating outside sound, you *do* hear noise as the cable rubs against your clothing if you move around...

  Show less

  9 out of 9 users found this user opinion helpful.

• 9 stars

  Great ear buds!

  by sannyc22 on February 26, 2006

  Pros: Love the bass

  Cons: Not good if you need to be aware of suroundings.

  Summary: I absolutely love these ear buds. They provide the sound that I used to get when I pressed my old ear buds deep into my ears to hear the nuances ...

  Read more

  Summary: I absolutely love these ear buds. They provide the sound that I used to get when I pressed my old ear buds deep into my ears to hear the nuances of a particular song, but lost all richness when I removed the pressure of my fingers. I wanted the E4s, but didn?t have the $200 plus so these are great substitutes for the price.

  Show less

  8 out of 9 users found this user opinion helpful.

• 9 stars

  I love 'em!

  by Elvis_1967 on March 14, 2006

  Pros: Sound quality.

  Cons: No carry case.

  Summary: This is my first pair of ear canal 'phones, I changed from Sennheiser MX550s. The sound quality is incredible, the detail is much better. For work I use Beyer Dynamic ...

  Read more

  Summary: This is my first pair of ear canal 'phones, I changed from Sennheiser MX550s. The sound quality is incredible, the detail is much better. For work I use Beyer Dynamic DT990s and the Sennheisers obviously aren't as good as these but nor are they as big & heavy. On the train & walking through central London to work there's a lot of background noise & it no longer gets in the way of the music although I'm still aware of it as I don't need to turn the volume anything like as high. My Creative Zen has a volume setting of 0-25, with the OED 'phones it was set at 20-22, the MX550s at 15-17, the CX300s it's down to 9 or 10. My hearing's safe & I get all the clarity (and a little more battery life)!

  Show less

  5 out of 5 users found this user opinion helpful.

• 8 stars

  Surprisingly great sound quality, particularly for the money.

  by make_or_break on April 7, 2006

  Pros: Very detailed sound, reasonably good isolation.

  Cons: C'mon...even the (far) lesser MX earbuds came with a case.

  Summary: After having little or no luck with other canal phones at the this end of the market (namely with those from Sony), I thought I was resigned to continue to ...

  Read more

  Summary: After having little or no luck with other canal phones at the this end of the market (namely with those from Sony), I thought I was resigned to continue to use my Etymotic ER-4S set everywhere and anywhere, at least whenever I chose to go for the maximum isolation with my portable DAPs.
  
  Don't get me wrong; I truly enjoy my ER-4s set. Their sonics are exceptional, and they're really comfortable to me once they're fitted properly. But I tend to be HARD on my portable music gear, particularly when it comes to cans. Some might not have a problem with the sort of harshness and abuse that I'd put them through; they'd just go out and buy a replacement set. I tend to be too cheap for that, however; I want the ER-4s to last a while, if at all possible.
  
  The Senn CX300 makes that possible. This unit has a sound that, in my opinion, will match up favorably against any comparable design going in less than $125 street price range. They're affordable enough that if I break them I won't cry nearly as much, but the perform so well that most anything else in this range will at best finish runner-up. They're quite comfortable out of the box (probably should be no surprise considering how Sennheiser usually has a pattern of making very easy-to-wear designs to begin with), and while they like virtually all canals in this range have a habit of transmitting cable vibrations, it's not as irritating as it was with other brands that I tried in the past. Fatigue with use is less of a problem with these as well; in fact, I actually prefer the CX300 over my Etys from a comfort and extended-use standpoint.
  
  The only real drawback is that Sennheiser didn't provide any sort of protective carrying case for when these canals are not in use. Surprising, but not the end of the world; considering how good these sound, it wouldn't be earth-shattering if one wanted to keep these on all the time, anyways.
  
  The CX300 have been a very pleasant surprise. Highly recommended for those on a budget that want a high degree of noise isolation.

  Show less

  2 out of 2 users found this user opinion helpful.

• 8 stars

  Amazing IE buds!!!!

  by artgoi on February 16, 2006

  Pros: amazing quality at an amazing price!!

  Cons: so far none

  Summary: Excellent IE buds...for the money! As good if perhaps not better than the super.fi 3S which are at almost twice the price. Good going, Senn!

  Summary: Excellent IE buds...for the money! As good if perhaps not better than the super.fi 3S which are at almost twice the price. Good going, Senn!

  2 out of 2 users found this user opinion helpful.

• 9 stars

  sweet buds!!!

  by lindfr on November 6, 2007

  Pros: great sound

  Cons: none so far

  Summary: As an ear physician, I am very critical of all ear buds. I usually find that they lack clear sound and bass. These buds rock! They have the sound of ...

  Read more

  Summary: As an ear physician, I am very critical of all ear buds. I usually find that they lack clear sound and bass. These buds rock! They have the sound of very good mickey mouse type ear phones. Great buy for <100$.

  Show less

  1 out of 1 users found this user opinion helpful.

• 9 stars

  Really good in-the-ear headphones that are highly recommended

  by Mike6636 on January 26, 2007

  Pros: Very good sound quality; comfortable in ears

  Cons: Cord material "seems" cheap

  Summary: I am not saying I am the best judge of audio quality, but I think I can tell the difference between the default headphones that come with most MP3 players ...

  Read more

  Summary: I am not saying I am the best judge of audio quality, but I think I can tell the difference between the default headphones that come with most MP3 players and these in-the-ear headphones. I was forced to buy a new pair of headphones when my Sony Fontopia's (MDREX71) right ear driver blew out. I thought the warranty covered them but realized that it had been 13 months and the warranty was up. The more reviews I read about these Sony's, the more I wondered why I purchased them in the first place (although I never did have problems with the cord fraying). So I turned to purchasing these Sennheiser ones over the Shure E2C. I am fairly certain that the Shure E2C's are probably really good, but their website describing the chore to get them in your ear was alarming to me and didn't want to spend 5 minutes to get them into my ear before heading to the gym.
  
  Some reviews mention that there is not enough bass. Well I will challenge that and ask what were these individuals actually expecting. The bass is more than adequate, but it does depend on how well the suction is created in your ear. I didn't notice any cord distortion either, and I spend time on multiple cardio machines. The noise-cancelling aspect is actually very good. I am able to listen to my workout music at a low volume and not even hear the machine that I am on, let alone the treadmills around me. The cord quality "seems" cheap, but I won't know until it frays or stops working. That is another reason I bought these...two year warranty that the Sony's did not have. All in all, for the price of less than $55 shipped, they are well worth it after only a few days. I would recommend buying these if you are looking for a better alternative than the ones that come with MP3 players.

  Show less

  1 out of 1 users found this user opinion helpful.

• 8 stars

  Excellent for price range

  by matt87109 on January 24, 2007

  Pros: Comfort, "out of your way design", Sound is excellent at low volumes

  Cons: mids range response drops off at higher volumes

  Summary: Excellent for the price range, but the base and treble overpowers the mid ranges at higher volumes. VERY nice at lower to mid volumes, which is what we should all ...

  Read more

  Summary: Excellent for the price range, but the base and treble overpowers the mid ranges at higher volumes. VERY nice at lower to mid volumes, which is what we should all be shooting for anyway.
  
  I was looking to upgrade cheaper ear bud headphones with an in-ear mid-priced set of ear phones. I think these will do the trick. I bought the e2c?s at first and while everybody says I didn?t have them in my ear right, the cx 300?s had plenty of base right out of the box and the e2c?s didn?t (I?m not willing to jam something that far in my ear if that?s what it takes). In fact the cx 300?s have too much base so I had to turn it down on my EQ.
  
  If you demand loud and highly accurate music (these extenuate the base and treble too much at louder volumes), then I would recommend seeing if you can get base (unlike me) out of the e2c?s by experimenting with the fit.
  
  Again I would say these are EXCELLENT at moderate volumes for the price range.

  Show less

  1 out of 1 users found this user opinion helpful.

• 10 stars

  Hard to believe, but they are perfect

  by aronhalt1 on December 18, 2006

  Pros: Awesome full range sound, comfortable, not Sony

  Cons: None yet, hopefully never

  Summary: If you want good sound with clear, crisp highs, and deep lows, then in the ear phones are the way to go. They actually use your ear canal as a ...

  Read more

  Summary: If you want good sound with clear, crisp highs, and deep lows, then in the ear phones are the way to go. They actually use your ear canal as a speaker box and let me tell you, they rival even the best 'over the ear' designs. Add to that the fact that they are tiny and you won't look like an idiot wearing them at the gym, and you have a remarkable product.
  
  I had a pair of similar earphones from Sony. I think they were the Craptopia model (spelling?). Actually, I still have them. Belive it or not, the quality is so poor that they are falling apart while they sit on the shelf. For some reason, Sony decided to make the wires for the Fontopia headphones using a material which is not compatible with skin oil. When I called then they claimed ignorance to the issue and offered me another pair for $20 because my warranty was up a couple of days early.
  
  They sound as good or better than the Sony offering, and you don't have to give Sony any more of your money.

  Show less

  1 out of 1 users found this user opinion helpful.

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• ...
• 11
• next

See pricing