Adobe Photoshop Lightroom v1.0 complete package (PC & Mac)
Manufacturer: Adobe Systems Inc. Part number: 19250010
- More product information:
- Editors' review
- User reviews
- Specifications
- Manufacturer info
- Bottom Line:
- For downloading, retouching, and exporting raw-format photos, Adobe Lightroom is the cat's pajamas.
Read more
Where to buy
| store | customer rating | inventory | tax & shipping | price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Savings, Selection & Service since 1971 | ![]() | In stock Clearance Item: Limited Availability, New, 100% Guarant | Enter zip code to get total price: Price +Tax +Shipping =Total price | as of 12/08/2009 |
CNET editors' review
Adobe Photoshop Lightroom v1.0 complete package (PC & Mac) price range: $289.99
- Reviewed by: Lori Grunin
- Reviewed on: 02/23/2007
The good: Excellent retouching tools in a streamlined interface; delivers great results.
The bad: Needs more color management; print spooling, slide show generation, and Web layout require a substantial amount of horsepower.
The bottom line: For downloading, retouching, and exporting raw-format photos, Adobe Lightroom is the cat's pajamas.
Lightroom is my new favorite software. It's not perfect, and on occasion can be downright frustrating, but it also saves me hours of work, which has in turn encouraged me to be a bit more aggressive in my retouching choices.
The best way to explain why it's so helpful is by running you through my work flow. I come home after a day of shooting cat photos at a shelter, pop my SD card into my laptop, and allow Lightroom's downloader to do its stuff. I have a keyword and metadata preset that it automatically applies to each photo, and all I have to change is the name of the directory in which to drop the photos. I shoot simultaneous raw and JPEG; Lightroom loads the raw versions and just copies the JPEG files.
Once downloaded, I scroll through the photos, adding the ones that have potential to a Quick Collection by pressing "B." I frequently have frames for which the flash didn't fire, so as I scroll through, I hit Auto Tone to bring up the exposure and see if these black photos are salvageable. After sorting through all those images, I then filter it to the Quick Collection for further work. For each of the photos, I need to decide whether it's going to my Web site, Petfinder, or both. I make a pass through the photos, retouching for tonality and cropping for aesthetics; this usually takes about two minutes per photo. I then export to one directory using my high-resolution JPEG preset. While that's processing, I go back through the collection, drop out the ones I don't need for Petfinder, then recrop the remainder for best animal presentation. These get exported using another preset, which compresses them and constrains the maximum image dimension to 500 pixels, and drops them in a second directory.
This is both a typical and an atypical work flow--one of Lightroom's charms is you can adapt it to many different processes and can move back and forth almost seamlessly between tasks. There's nothing really new you can do with Lightroom--Adobe Camera Raw has had this sort of nondestructive editing capability for a while--but with Lightroom, it finally feels natural to not worry about saving versions. There are shortcut keys for everything, and you rarely need to go to the menus. Property panels slide in and out to maximize screen real estate.
Though quite strong in some areas, Adobe seems to have had some difficulty conceptualizing the interface for online output. Lightroom can generate slide shows and Web galleries, which Adobe has arbitrarily separated by technology, rather than treating them as different ways of viewing photos: Slide shows are output to PDF, while Web galleries are written to Flash or HTML. Both modules feel fairly undercooked, especially when compared with the options available for print, many of which would work very well for online application, like the extensive text annotations. You can upload the galleries to a custom FTP server, though, which is nice.
Furthermore, most rendering operations can really bog down the software, such as thumbnails for slide shows and especially spooling for print. I find it faster on my 1.2GHz Core Duo laptop than my 2.4GHz Pentium 4 desktop (with the same 1.5GB RAM), which makes sense given how much of it Lightroom does in the background. From a performance perspective, Lightroom is clearly a version 1.0 product.
Lightroom doesn't fully replace Photoshop, even for basic raw processing, because you need Photoshop's Proof Preview for accurate color matching. Basically, Lightroom relies on existing color profiles to map screen to print, with no print simulation view. Grrr. Adobe really gets some demerits for this. On the upside, there are plenty of users hanging out in Adobe forums and plenty of third-party tutorials, tips, and tricks on the Web waiting to help you.
Ultimately, Lightroom is one of those programs you simply have to try for yourself to ascertain how it fits into your work style. What I can tell you, is it's worth making the time to give it a shot.
User reviews
-
-
Considering the amount of beta testing one has to wonder how much Adobe listened to beta testers.
by Heebee Jeebies on March 3, 2007
Pros: Pretty nice interface, though different from any thing Adobe. Fairly decent set of tools.
Cons: Slow, Slow, Slow. Buggy, Buggy, Buggy. Lacking some very basic features like noise reduction, good sharpening and lens distortion correction.
Summary: Considering Lightroom was in beta test for over a year, I don't feel Adobe did to good of a job. They say they listened to the beta testers but ...
Summary: Considering Lightroom was in beta test for over a year, I don't feel Adobe did to good of a job. They say they listened to the beta testers but I see very little evidence that they did, which seems to be pretty typical. Beta testers didn't like the database idea for storing their images, they wanted noise reduction that worked, they wanted at least Photoshop's Smart Sharpen options and they wanted lens distortion correction tools. Better print layout options, etc.
While I have looked and used most of the other raw processing programs and have found the Lightroom interface and way of working to be the best for me. The lack of even the most basic of digital photography tools, the massive amounts of bugs, the sometimes unintuitive way of how things work (try the crop tool and try dragging the crop frame around, you move it left it goes right move up it goes down, I don't know what they were thinking) and the deathly slow performance on even a high end machine (Adobe promised it would be fast on even a entry level P4 system) and what you have is an expensive product that needs to be fixed quickly. If Adobe waits a year and half to fix and provide the missing features they will find Lightroom going the way of their other dodo products like ImageStyler and LiveMotion.
Time will tell if this lame dock can heal itself or if it is for ever grounded.4 out of 4 users found this user opinion helpful.
-
Great workflow addition
by allanjder on March 4, 2007
Pros: Best addition to RAW photo workflow.
Cons: Can not make photo books like Apple Aperture.
Summary: Best addition to my digital darkroom. I can get my color in a fraction of the time it took in Adobe Photoshop CS and is non distructive. Streamlines printing, I ...
Summary: Best addition to my digital darkroom. I can get my color in a fraction of the time it took in Adobe Photoshop CS and is non distructive. Streamlines printing, I set my color preferences (ICC printer profiles), and just print. Black and White conversion is easy has heck, beats channel mixing. Great for my first round of workprints. It integration to Photoshop is also good (I am using Photoshop CS3 beta now) when I need to do more. Lightroom is meant to work with Photoshop and Bridge and I find myself almost not needing Photoshop. I love the web functions save to flash, makes stealing my images harder.
-
A simple tool for digital photographers
by hinyan on March 3, 2007
Pros: The workflow does work
Cons: It needs better RAW options
Summary: I'd been a beta user and version 1.0 is pretty good (for a version 1.0 product). I already use Photoshop CS2 but Lightroom is great for digital ...
Summary: I'd been a beta user and version 1.0 is pretty good (for a version 1.0 product). I already use Photoshop CS2 but Lightroom is great for digital photography - you can save Photoshop for real image manipulation. Really easy to use and now with x-platform licencing, I can run it on Windows XP at home and still use the same software on my PowerBook on the go. I just wish Adobe will continue to do x-platform licencing for its other products.
Specifications
- Manufacturer: Adobe Systems Inc.
- Part number: 19250010
- Description: Adobe Photoshop Lightroom software is the professional photographer's essential toolbox, providing one easy application for managing, adjusting, and presenting large volumes of digital photographs so you can spend less time in front of the computer and more time behind the lens.
General
- Category Creativity application
- Subcategory Creativity - graphics & image editing
- Version 1.0
- Language(s) Adobe Universal English
- License pricing Standard
Software
- License Type Complete package
- License Qty 1 user
- License Pricing Standard
- Platform MacOS, Windows
- Distribution Media CD-ROM
- Package Type Retail
System Requirements
- OS Required Apple MacOS X 10.4
- Min Processor Type 1 GHz
- Peripheral / Interface Devices CD-ROM, XGA monitor
- System Requirements Details Microsoft Windows XP SP2 - Pentium 4 - RAM 768 MB - HD 1 GB, Apple MacOS X 10.4 - PowerPC G4 - RAM 768 MB - HD 1 GB
Manufacturer info
- Adobe Systems Inc.
- Manufacturer profile
- Browse Adobe Systems Inc. products on Shopper.com
-
- Website: http://www.adobe.com/
- Address:
345 Park Ave.
San Jose, CA 95110 - Phone: 408-536-6000
- Fax: 408-537-6000









