Samsung SyncMaster XL2370
Manufacturer: Samsung Part number: XL2370
- More product information:
- Editors' review
- User reviews
- Specifications
- Manufacturer info
- Bottom Line:
- The Samsung SyncMaster XL2370 looks great, performs well, and hits the right price point.
Read more
Where to buy
| store | customer rating | inventory | tax & shipping | price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best Buy Authorized store | ![]() | See Site | Enter zip code to get total price: Price +Tax +Shipping =Total price | as of 12/08/2009 |
CNET editors' review
Samsung SyncMaster XL2370 price range: $299.99
- Reviewed by: Eric Franklin
- Edited by: Bonnie Cha
- Reviewed on: 09/03/2009
The good: The Samsung SyncMaster XL2370 is low-priced, beautifully designed, and offers great overall performance. Also, it's one of the lightest and thinnest monitors we've tested of any size.
The bad: The Samsung SyncMaster XL2370 lacks ergonomic features and its base is quite wobbly.
The bottom line: The Samsung SyncMaster XL2370 looks great, performs well, and hits the right price point.
The 23-inch Samsung SyncMaster XL2370 is thin, sleek, and light. It's as if Samsung's own P2370 had a thinner, prettier sister. In addition, the XL also has an LED backlight that lets it perform better in movies and games. The monitor won't be available in the U.S. until October 12, 2009, but Samsung expects the XL2370 to have an estimated street price of $299. That's about $35 more than what the P2370 is currently going for, but it is about the same price as the 24-inch LED-backlit Dell G2410. However, our pick for best overall 23-inch monitor is still the $319 23-inch Dell SP2309W, with its high 2,048x1,152-pixel resolution, ergonomic options, Webcam, and USB ports. While the XL attempts to compensate with better looks, a thinner design, ease of portability, and great performance, the SP2309W's features win out in the end.
Design and features
As we mentioned before, the 23-inch Samsung SyncMaster XL2370 looks like a thinner, sleeker version of Samsung's P2370. The display measures just larger than half an inch in depth--a considerably thin measurement since most monitors of this size, such as the SP2309W, measure thicker than 2 inches. The XL's depth is about half the depth of the P2370, which we already considered very thin. The bezel measures 1.1 inches on the sides and 1.75 inches on the bottom where a light-gray Samsung logo resides. On the edge of the bezel is a plastic transparent overlay. According to Samsung, this overlay changes color based on the color of the light in the room, yet, this isn't entirely accurate. As different colored light passes through the overlay, it only gives the impression that the display is changing color.
The full width of the display is 22.4 inches, about the same as the P2370. The screen has a matte finish and the neck of the display shares its design with the P2370 and is still one of the most aesthetically unique designs we've ever seen. The neck is made of transparent glass with bluish crystals at the bottom. The glass reflects the crystals, which creates a blue hue within the neck. The effect is subtle, but it makes the XL2370 and the P2370 stand out visually among other monitors.
The oval-shaped footstand is 11 inches wide by 7.5 inches deep, but even with such a wide footstand, the display wobbles considerably--even with just a small shove. This is because of, in part, the display's light weight. It weighs less than 8 pounds; about 3.5 pounds lighter than the 20-inch HP 2009m and 1.5 pounds lighter than the P2370. The G2410 weighs 12 pounds, while the SP2309 comes just over 17 pounds.
The bottom of the bezel sits about 2.4 inches from the desktop, but unfortunately, the screen height isn't adjustable and there isn't a screen rotation or pivot option for portrait mode. The capability to tilt the screen back 25 degrees is the only included ergonomic feature.
In the review of the P2370, we speculated that one of the reasons that monitor didn't include any additional connections other than DVI-D was to save on cost and to keep it as thin as possible. We can throw both of those theories out the window. The XL2370 is thinner than the P2370, costs only a few dollars more, and has more connection options, including DVI-D, HDM, and analog and digital audio out connections.
All connections sit on its back in the lower midsection of the panel and face backward, instead of down, as on most monitors. The connections are only recessed about half an inch into the monitor making them easy to access.
Pressing your finger against the bottom right-hand corner of the bezel brings up the hidden onscreen display button array. The white, glowing buttons disappear after a couple moments of inactivity; however, there is an option in the OSD to illuminate them at all times for easier calibration. You can also set the OSD to be onscreen for 5, 10, 20, or 200 seconds. The array consists of a Menu button, an Up and Down button, an Enter button, and an Auto button. The Up and Down buttons also double as a brightness and preset shortcut buttons respectively. Picture options consist of brightness, contrast, and sharpness. You can also set the color tone to Cool, Normal, Warm, or Custom, letting you change the red, green, and blue attributes individually. There are seven presets including Custom, Text, Internet, Game, Sport, Movie, and Dynamic Contrast. Each preset changes the color temperature and brightness of the display to be appropriate to the task at hand. While not as intuitive as Dell's brilliantly designed OSDs--seen in the G2410 and SP2309W--the XL2370 takes only a short learning curve to get the hang of it. Also, we liked that the preset menu was only one button press away, a perk missing from the G2410.
The Samsung SyncMaster XL2370's 16:9 aspect ratio supports a "Full HD" 1,920x1,080-pixel native resolution. This continues the trend of more and more monitor vendors moving toward 16:9 from 16:10 because high-definition content--in particular 1080p movies--can fit onto a 1,920x1,080-pixel screen in full-screen mode without stretching the image.
Manufacturer's specifications:
Resolution: 1,920x1,080
Pixel-response rate: 2ms
Contrast ratio: 1,000:1
Connectivity: HDMI, DVI-D
HDCP compliant? Yes
Included video cables? DVI, DVI to VGA
Backlight: LED
Panel Type: TN
Performance
We tested the Samsung SyncMaster XL2370 with its DVI connection. The display posted a composite score of 96 on CNET Labs' DisplayMate-based performance tests, besting the P2370, the SP2309's 90, but coming in just under the Dell G2410's 97. The P2370 got nearly perfect scores in our color test and the color tracking error that hampered the P2370's score failed to rear its head here. In our Dark Screen test, clouding or backlight bleed through was noticeable on the top and especially the bottom middle edge of the screen.
The XL2370 achieved a brightness score of 344 candelas per square meter (cd/m2)--much higher than the P2370's 239 cd/m2, the SP2309W's 297 cd/m2, and the Dell G2410's 234 cd/m2. The XL2370 just has a bright screen. When we set the brightness of the P2370 and XL2370 to 100 and 75 respectively, we found that when looking at the same image, the XL's whites were noticeably brighter without compromising the dark detail and deep blacks of the image. This made for a higher contrast between the blacks and whites and for a much more natural-looking image. Hmmm, maybe this is what Samsung means by the "Mega" contrast sticker included on the display's bezel.
We used the XL2370's Movie preset to check out "Kill Bill Vol. 1" on DVD and a number of 1080p movie files from Microsoft's WMV HD Showcase.
In both Kill Bill and the 1080p movies, we found the color quality on the XL2370 better than that of either the Dell G2410 or the Samsung P2370. While the P2370 had a slightly washed out and muted look, the XL was bright in places it needed to be and appropriately dark when it was called for. In comparison to the other monitors, the G2410 had a slight bluish hue that threw its colors off. Deep blacks--a critical attribute for good movie playback--did not elude the XL2370 as it did the P2370. The Dell G2410 also sported deep blacks, but sometimes its picture was too dark and made seeing dark detail difficult.
As good as movies looked in the Movie preset, we found that the Dynamic Contrast preset worked best for movie watching. With Dynamic Contrast on, we only noticed the screen darkening on scenes where the screen is 90 percent black or more, such as the end credits and during fades to black. In the DC preset, blacks looked darker and the colors slightly more full.
We looked at World of Warcraft and Unreal Tournament 3 and noticed no signs of input lag or any streaking or ghosting during fast movement. Like in movies, in the game preset, the whites were brighter than on either the G2410 or the P2370 and the blacks were appropriately dark.
Much of this great performance can be attributed to the LED backlight in the monitor. Most monitors use cold cathode fluorescent lamp-based backlights--several fluorescent tubes stretched horizontally across the screen. The Samsung SyncMaster XL2370 relies on individual LEDs all over the back of the screen that turn off or on independently, giving the display more precise control over the amount of light that comes through. The purported advantages of an LED backlight are better energy efficiency, more accurate color reproduction, a conceivably thinner panel design, and a higher potential brightness level. Samsung seems to be using all of these features in the XL2370.
The optimal viewing angle for a monitor is usually directly in front, about a quarter of the screen's distance down from the top. At this angle, you're viewing the colors and gamma correction as they were intended. Most monitors are not made to be viewed at any other angle. Depending on its panel type, picture quality at non-optimal angles varies. Most monitors use TN panels that get overly bright or overly dark in parts of the screen when viewed from nonoptimal angles. The Samsung SyncMaster XL2370 uses a TN panel, and when it is viewed from the sides or bottom, we perceived the screen to darken about 6 inches off from center. Of course, when viewed from the optimal angle, we had no problems.
There is an option in the OSD to set the refresh rate of the monitor from Slow to Fast to Faster. Adjusting this setting did not affect performance in any way that we noticed. Samsung did not get back to us as to what this setting is for, but it could be Samsung's version of overdrive. By sending out bursts of voltage to the liquid crystals that increase the crystal's transitions speeds, overdrive can effectively reduce the amount of noticeable ghosting effects.
| Samsung SyncMaster XL2370 | Average watts per hour | ||
| On (default luminance) | 30.08 | ||
| On (max luminance) | 30.08 | ||
| On (min luminance) | 15.7 | ||
| Sleep | 1.42 | ||
| Calibrated (200 cd/m2) | 21 | ||
| Annual energy cost | $9.96 | ||
| Score | Fair | ||
In our power consumption tests, the Samsung XL2370 had a high On/Default power draw of 30.09 watts. This is because of Samsung setting the monitor's default brightness to 100 percent. Its standby power is a fairly low 1.42 watts. With a calibrated brightness of 200 cd/m2, the XL draws about 21 watts, compared with 19.43 watts and 27.52 watts at the same brightness respectively for the G2410 and P2370. Based on our formula, the XL2370 would cost $9.96 per year to run, compared with the P2370's $9.37 per year and the G2410's $7.26.
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
Service and support
Samsung backs the SyncMaster XL2370 with a three-year parts-and-labor warranty that covers the backlight. It also offers support through a 24-7 toll-free number, as well as 24- to 48-hour turnaround e-mail and Web chat support. Documentation and support software for the XL2370 were not yet available on Samsung's Web site at the time this review was published.
Find out more about how we test LCD monitors.
User reviews
-
-
This is by far the best choice for PS3 4 the price.
by Benners2009 on October 23, 2009
Pros: No ghosting
No Motion Blur at all
Low Input lag (reportedly less than a frame)
Great Color for a TN Panel
Incredibly great contrast ratio (which is good on fps discerning bad guys really far away from the background)
Looks great on MGS4 and Res2Cons: No OSD save setting so you can't set it the way you like then change it 2 something else and then reselect your old setting. So if you change it 2 look the best for you PC then you have to change it back manually to get back 2 the best PS3 settings.
Summary: Koshinn's post above me is before he did some extra testing. He found that his first posted numbers weren't the input lag of the Samsung XL2370. We have ...
Summary: Koshinn's post above me is before he did some extra testing. He found that his first posted numbers weren't the input lag of the Samsung XL2370. We have been discussing this in another forum. I really trust cnet's reviews when it comes to the picture quality of HDTVs and LCD Monitors and that is how I first became interested in this monitor when I was looking to get a nice display for my PS3 in my room and saw cnet's very positive review. While I trust cnet's evaluation of picture quality (since they are pretty critical and particular in those areas among other things), I wasn't too sure about how in-depth they got into things like input lag as that is something most monitor owners aren't concerned with. While they did say there was no noticeable input lag, it doesn't seem like they did any overly technical test to determine the amount of input lag. I then came across a review on digitalversus and they claimed that it has an average of less that a frame of input lag. They also have a chart for each monitor showing how much colored and reverse ghosting there is for each monitor. That site reinforced my excitement about this montior as it wasn't out yet. I just got this monitor I think on wednesday and it is truly spectacular. I haven't found any ghosting or blur at all when playing games and that is really important to me because I am a competitive fps player and I want to be able to see well when I spin around real fast to get a headshot on whoever is attacking me from behind. The monitor scales 720p extremely well as Killzone 2, Resistance 2, Soul Calibur IV, and Fallout 3 all look great. I can't tell you how it looks on COD4 as I traded it in recently for credit towards MW2 (which is the main reason I got this monitor). I am very happy with the gaming performance of this monitor.
4 out of 4 users found this user opinion helpful.
-
Good for everything but FPS and fighting games
by Koshinn on October 20, 2009
Pros: Thin
Light
Looks great
Amazingly bright
Very sharp picture
Above average color reproductionCons: 6 frames of lag (1/10th second or 100ms) over HDMI
9-10 frames of lag (150-166ms) over DVI-A
That means playing single-player or local multiplayer games is like online, and online is just that much more laggy.Summary: As fighting game players know, 6 frames of lag makes some moves guaranteed and many others almost impossible to see before they hit. As FPS players know, 1/10th of ...
Summary: As fighting game players know, 6 frames of lag makes some moves guaranteed and many others almost impossible to see before they hit. As FPS players know, 1/10th of a second is a LOT of time to be missing.
Upon further testing it seems I jumped to a conclusion. The monitor only lags over DVI-A, not HDMI. It seems Street Fighter IV is culprit here, it lags 6 frames consistently over all systems and televisions I've tested in the last 24 hours. It's strange that no one has found this before.
If you're not in a very competitive category in either of those two games, you probably won't notice it. If you're playing any other type of game, doing office work, media work, or just surfing the web, this monitor is perfect.
I wish CNET did in-depth input lag tests rather than just by "feel." It's about time that a major review site started releasing test numbers on input lag to put manufacturers in their place.
There are two ways to test input lag that I know of, both require a camera with 60 fps video recording or faster.
What I did was played a fighting game (SF IV) with known attack speeds in frames. In this case, Ryu's close LP is 3 frames. You setup the camera such that you can see the screen and your keyboard. Hit the attack key as quickly as possible, leaving your finger down. You count the frames it takes from your finger pressing the key until the attack connects, then subtract the known speed of the attack - 3 frames. I counted 9 over HDMI and 12-13 over DVI-A. Thus, 6 and 9-10 frames of lag respectively.
The best test, however, requires a splitter for your output. You run a stopwatch on your computer with miliseconds displayed, then split the output, one to a CRT and one to the test monitor. CRTs (not HD TVs) via VGA have zero input lag generally, but use the previous method to test them first. Then use a camera with a high shutter speed (with both the control and test monitor in frame) and basically take a series of pictures and average the difference you see in the stopwatch on both screens. That'll give you a much more accurate input lag reading, but in general, frames are enough... a frame being 1/60th of a second, or the speed at which PS3/360 games run and the max refresh rate of most LCDs.
Updated on Oct 21, 2009
I'd give this monitor a 4.5 star rating now; it still doesn't show your bios and other startup information when connected through hdmi or dvi-a.3 out of 3 users found this user opinion helpful.
-
XL2370 great monitor for price
by therob127 on October 12, 2009
Pros: LED backlight
digital audio out
only HDMI and DVI connector, but still providing a cable to convert D-SUB to DVI
Price/Picture QualityCons: touch sensitive buttons can be annoying to touch at times
Summary: I was lucky that Best Buy was selling a day earlier than they were suppose to, or I would have never seen this beauty. Gaming and HD movies/shows look ...
Summary: I was lucky that Best Buy was selling a day earlier than they were suppose to, or I would have never seen this beauty. Gaming and HD movies/shows look amazing. For the price, this is the best monitor to get.
3 out of 3 users found this user opinion helpful.
-
Even at $379 its still a steal.
by cryosin on October 29, 2009
Pros: LED looks spectacular.
16:9 aspect ratio makes it perfect for home entertainment (ps3, digital receivers, movie players etc.).
1080p
Sleek design, very thin and light.Cons: Included instructions are very basic and dont explain any of features such as why there are different "Response Time" settings on the monitor.
Touch sensitive controls
As others have stated no mounting screw holes.
Only 25 degree tilt.Summary: Its a monitor, and the best monitor i've ever owned. Period. If you don't have room for a big screen HDTV or want something for competitive gaming with ...
Summary: Its a monitor, and the best monitor i've ever owned. Period. If you don't have room for a big screen HDTV or want something for competitive gaming with great picture quality, this is the deal. The new LED technology is a huge difference. Amazing picture quality and great response time(2ms).
There are obviously some cons, the biggest one has to be the lack of mounting screws, but a trip to home depot can get you a makeshift apparatus for that problem.
Overall if your looking to spend <$500 on a good LCD this is the one to get hands down. It's not a T.V. but if you have a digital receiver you can input it through DVI/HDMI/Component cables and use it as one. LG's 24" LED is a close competitor but the 16:9 aspect ratio makes this monitor much more versatile for console gaming and Hi-Def content.1 out of 1 users found this user opinion helpful.
-
Spectacular Contrast and Brightness Support
by smodd on December 2, 2009
Pros: Image represents all the good to come in Modern Color Reproduction Devices
Light and easy to assembly
Best colors than Premium MVA / IPS Panels
Best Buy so FarCons: Sensitive buttons need time to get use to it, but i prefer these than physical ones.
Summary: Spectacular capacity to tolerate extremely high levels of contrast...
I set this baby to 100 contrast and 100 bright and can not lose contrast neither bright level capacity.
I set ...Summary: Spectacular capacity to tolerate extremely high levels of contrast...
I set this baby to 100 contrast and 100 bright and can not lose contrast neither bright level capacity.
I set this with the next values:
Gamma 3
No Magic Color
Color Tone : Warm
100 Contrast
100 Bright for Movies / 10 Bright for web and windows
Use kmplayer and select for Wide anamorphic movies Pan & Scan = Present = Edit ...
Values Left: 0 / Width: 0 / Top : -7 / Height : 14
For 4:3 Movies
Left : -17 / Width : 34 / Top : -1 / Height : 2
Then while watching a movies press * (asterix button) to cycle through the modes.
Recommendation use in advance screen prperties the nvidia control panel and select Adjust color settings..
Then select with the nvidia settings dont change anything ... and in the advance tab select dynamic range:
Full 0-255
I hope i helped...Bye
Great review Cnet , Great Monitor Samsung Thks... -
best buy sucks
by ksnake1986 on October 28, 2009
Pros: like the monitor but,
Cons: ***! best buy jacks up the price for the monitor overnight from 300 to 379
0 out of 2 users found this user opinion helpful.
Specifications
- Manufacturer: Samsung
- Part number: XL2370
- Bottom Line: The Samsung SyncMaster XL2370 looks great, performs well, and hits the right price point.
Sustainability
- CNET Labs: Operational power consumption 30.08 Watt
- CNET Labs: Calibrated power consumption 21 Watt
- CNET Labs: Max brightness power consumption calibrated 30.08 Watt
- CNET Labs: Min brightness power consumption 15.7 Watt
- CNET Labs: Power consumption Stand by / Sleep 1.42 Watt
- CNET Labs: Estimated Annual Energy Cost 9.96 US Dollars
Manufacturer info
- Samsung
- Manufacturer profile
- Browse Samsung products on Shopper.com
-
- Website: http://www.samsungusa.com/
- Address:
105 Challenger Road, Ridgefield Park, NJ 07660 - Phone: 1-800-726-7864
- Fax: 1-973-601-6001








