Soldier of Fortune: Payback (PC)
Manufacturer: Activision Part number: 35523
- More product information:
- Editors' review
- User reviews
- Specifications
- Manufacturer info
Where to buy
| store | customer rating | inventory | tax & shipping | price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ![]() | In stock Order Now-Ships Today | Enter zip code to get total price: Price +Tax +Shipping =Total price | as of 11/07/2009 |
| Inetvideo.com | Not yet rated | In stock | as of 11/07/2009 |
Gamespot editors' review
Soldier of Fortune: Payback (PC) price range: $4.49 - $28.99
- Reviewed by: Jason Ocampo
- Reviewed on: 11/28/2007
- Released on: 11/14/2007
If you've ever wondered what happened to the Soldier of Fortune franchise, you're not alone. The first two Soldier of Fortune games were popular shooters in their day, blending fun single-player and multiplayer gameplay with the concept of playing as a mercenary. But after 2002's Soldier of Fortune II: Double Helix, the franchise seemed to fall off the face of the planet. Unfortunately, it should have stayed missing in action because the series has been resurrected with Soldier of Fortune: Payback, a shooter that embraces all the wrong lessons that have been learned over the past decade.

Don't let its looks fool you; Soldier of Fortune Payback is one of the most frustrating shooters of the year.
At first glance, Payback looks like a very pretty game. The visuals aren't cutting-edge, but there's an attractive quality to them, from the lavish depth-of-field blur effects that kick in whenever you reload your weapon to the lush lighting. You no longer play as John Mullins, the hero of the first two games, but rather as a new mercenary caught up in a very cliché and badly told tale of a worldwide terrorist organization that's so clever it brands all of its operatives with the very same tattoo on their necks. It's a wonder they're so difficult to find.
However, it all goes downhill quickly because Payback reveals itself to be a relentlessly linear and highly scripted shooter with a lot of flaws. Perhaps the most frustrating of these deals with the fact that the game relies on a checkpoint save system with no ability to quicksave, which means that if you're killed, you have to restart from the last checkpoint. That wouldn't be so much of an issue if those checkpoints were frequent and numerous, but they're not. Thus, much of the game's six to eight hours of gameplay is spent trying and retrying to get through the many sections of the game. Though there's a regenerating health system, you still die all too easily. It's not uncommon to have to replay a section a dozen times or more before you finally beat it.
The artificial intelligence is bad and consists mainly of two scripted actions. Once triggered, a bad guy will either run straight at you or stand in the open and shoot at you. There's no sense of dynamic behavior in the way the AI reacts to what you do. The weapon modeling is nonexistent; there's practically zero recoil on any of the weapons, even the light machine guns. On the flip side, even though the weapons all feel incredibly lightweight, they do a ridiculous amount of damage. The first Soldier of Fortune games were "edgy" in that you could practically dismember opponents with gunfire. The same goes for Payback, though it looks like the developers just copied and pasted the same code from the earlier games because the visual effect is almost exactly the same. Arms, legs, and heads all get shot off with absurd regularity while blood gushes everywhere. (The game does boast a low violence option that tones down this carnage.)

The single-player is six to eight hours of banging your head against a wall.
The music is actually pretty catchy, but the rest of the audio is lacking. The sound effects all seem canned, and the voice acting is terrible. The script certainly doesn't help either because the dialogue would be fitting for a straight-to-VHS action movie. The game also ends in a silly cliffhanger that assumes that gamers are going to want more of this action.
Additionally, Payback's multiplayer is very generic, with such modes as deathmatch, team deathmatch, and capture the flag. There's a whopping five multiplayer maps total, so there's not a lot of variety there either, which is also disappointing, considering Soldier of Fortune II's popular and fun multiplayer mode.
The PC game is slightly less expensive than major titles, but the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 games are full priced. Nevertheless, they're all a terrible value proposition considering the sheer quantity and high quality of shooters this year. Unless you like pain and frustration, there's simply no reason to play Soldier of Fortune: Payback when there are so many other better games on the market.
User reviews
-
-
Deserves every bad name under the sun!
by watto star on September 28, 2008
Pros: Graphics arent bad!
Cons: Everything else?
Summary: Why did they even bother. Its like they just HAD to make one, just for the sake of finishing it. I dont know HOW they had the balls to release ...
Summary: Why did they even bother. Its like they just HAD to make one, just for the sake of finishing it. I dont know HOW they had the balls to release a game as foul as this. Im sure they are all embarrased. I feel like ive been tricked due to their fancy cover and I hope they feel like frauds.
Running round in the first level feels like your running of stilts, your gun feels weightless and sounds like an airsoft gun, and the protruding bloood that comes out of your enemys are a bit far fetched. The game has a story, but I cant follow it because for some reason it starts from the middle of knowere.
If you somehow manage to survive the first level, try the second. Your in a jungle. Every time you see enemys you see them as 2d paper like figures firing at their hip, and you see on your screen this rip off blood effect.
Hating this game because everything about it is fake. It has no atmosphere. There seems to be no point in playing it because its just like a game of ping pong, it has the same point, and what makes it really wierd is the BEATIFUL graphics.
Cant explain the rest, but you can buy it, i mean I played $70 bucks for it. I would rather have payed $15 and have a cheap laugh..
..oh and by the way, dont get me started on multiplayer! -
Soldier of Fortune franchise gone really bad
by ajbabao on January 9, 2008
Pros: Nothing good to say about the software
Cons: Frustrating gameplay and graphics
Summary: whatever happend to the franchise. this game seems to go bad. from it's over active destructive weapons leaving your enemies bleeding profusely with blood and guts spurting out to ...
Summary: whatever happend to the franchise. this game seems to go bad. from it's over active destructive weapons leaving your enemies bleeding profusely with blood and guts spurting out to a red ink b;lotch everytime you get hit. i just played the first level and found the storyline to be cheap and the graphics is too bugeted. if you like first person shooters. stay clear from this one.
-
utter crap
by wingnut240 on December 29, 2007
Pros: weapon diversity
Cons: everything else
Summary: What the heck is this crap? This is NOT even worth of soldier of fortune branding, but thats what you get when you have BUDGET in the production company. Maybe ...
Summary: What the heck is this crap? This is NOT even worth of soldier of fortune branding, but thats what you get when you have BUDGET in the production company. Maybe if they'd have stayed with Raven it would have been half decent.
But I still tried it anyway, thankfully I got it on Amazon for $19 bucks instead of $40.
Yeah its fun to see the blood, but it gets old after the same baddie model shows up every third enemy. at least the rag doll physics were updated, but the dismemberment seems to have been toned down. Its too easy to blow off a leg, and in double helix, at least you still shoot of the foot or hand of the dismembered appendange, and remeber shooting the head bit by bit till the brain was out then, pop, it exploded on the next round? Nope, no more, a head shot turns the next into a crater from the chin up, no brain. which is about what I can say for the idiot who approved this game for release.
Two thumbs down and a third if I had another hand.
Save the cash and buy Crysis or maybe COD 4.
Specifications
- Manufacturer: Activision
- Part number: 35523
Product Basic Spec
- Platform PC
- ESRB rating Mature - Blood and Gore,Intense Violence,Sexual Themes,Drug Reference,Strong Language
- Genre Action
- Number of players 1 Player
- DirectX version v9.0c
- Operating system Windows XP/Vista
Game
- Developer Activision
- ESRB Mature
- ESRB descriptors Blood and Gore,Intense Violence,Sexual Themes,Drug Reference,Strong Language
Manufacturer info
- Activision
- Manufacturer profile
- Browse Activision products on Shopper.com
-
- Website: http://www.activision.com/
- Address:
3100 Ocean Park Blvd., Santa Monica, CA 90405 - Phone: 310-255-2000



